Looking back at the Nexus and Ares
WGF releases in particular what strikes me is the degree to which releases have clearly been targeted at a wide range of audiences with an arguably ahistorical but financially sensible bias towards certain markets. An obvious example would be the SE5A releases of Boudwin and Dallas, which clearly put marketing priorities well ahead of the historical aspects of the game. Were Nexus/Ares more interested in producing models that represented the most significant individuals flying those planes then you would expect to have seen James McCudden, Mick Mannock & George McElroy perhaps. Equally a more faithful representation of aerial warfare in WWI would demand a BE2c. However, flying a BE2c in the game is a distinctly acquired taste.
In short while we all have our favourites Ares' release policy is going to be determined by where they think they can sell the most models. The fact that I would love to see the R.A.F. B.E.12 which my grandfather flew in 1916 is utterly immaterial to those financial concerns, not least because (in addition to being a challenge to have a fun game with A B.E.12) there would be almost no demand for that plane from the US, Canadian, Australian, Italian & German markets for example and even for the UK it would be a distinctly niche model. This probably explains why the Sopwith Pup has yet to be produced - namely its very limited recognition factor outside primarily the UK market & to a lesser degree the Commonwealth markets.
And finally, eye-candy sells - players generally want bright colourful and eye-catching models. It appeals to our inner child and also the degree of individuality it implies. In the case of the Sopwith Pup I hope they produce three frontline RNAS and RFC versions as there's nothing to stop me repainting one as the No.19 Wing's 'Wasp' should I so wish (& have the ability) to do so nor anyone else repainting them as Imperial Russian Service planes should they wish to as well.
Tom
Bookmarks