Ares Games
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Halberstadt CL.II Firing Arcs

  1. #1

    Default Halberstadt CL.II Firing Arcs

    Not sure if this thread belongs here, in Rules, or House Rules...

    Regardless, has anyone given any thought to the observer's firing arcs for the newly-released CL.II? The official game piece has a set of pretty standard two-seater arcs... but the placement of the observer's weapon leads me to believe that it was capable of some over-wing fire. Was this the case? If so, should the CL.II possess a base somewhat more like that of the Roland C.II?

    Thoughts?

    Here are a few photos illustrating what I'm talking about...




    Love this photo, by the way. Great shot.


    This CL.II appears to have a hoop-shaped bar restricting the observer's field of fire directly to the front... but that's about it.



    In all, the observer's weapon appears capable of over-wing fire... but I'm not sure.

  2. #2

    Default

    It has been discussed; I'll have to hunt for the thread(s).
    Short answer, if memory serves, use the Roland template for gun arcs.
    Karl
    It is impossible for a man to begin to learn what he thinks he knows. -- Epictetus

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jager View Post
    It has been discussed; I'll have to hunt for the thread(s).
    Short answer, if memory serves, use the Roland template for gun arcs.
    Karl
    Thanks Karl. I had thought so, but my search-fu failed me.

    Roland template + CL.II agility = pure nasty. Love it.

  4. #4

    Default

    Interesting issue, Chris and Karl. Thanks for the heads up.
    <img src=http://www.wingsofwar.org/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=2554&dateline=1409073309 border=0 alt= />
    "We do not stop playing when we get old, but we get old when we stop playing."

  5. #5

    Default

    I found the discussion in the Unofficial stats committee forum; it had 2 conclusions that didn't get completely reconciled.
    Short answer is as above; use the Roland arcs. The longer one was that all CL class German, and the Bristol fighter have 360 degree arcs for the rear gunners, for targets at their altitude and higher; standard rear arcs for targets below your altitude.
    There is a short-range blindspot for the front and rear arcs for targets at your altitude. Also, the pilot and observer can not target the same plane.
    Karl
    It is impossible for a man to begin to learn what he thinks he knows. -- Epictetus

  6. #6

    Default

    Excellent info, Karl. Thanks to you and the stats committee. Hadn't initially included them in the discussion, but this makes sense for the Hannovers as well. And, good point about the Brisfit... as if it needed any more nasty.

    Think carefully before tangling with these kites.

  7. #7

    Default

    I believe the hoop is there to prevent the gunner from shooting the prop. Will double check.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by john snelling View Post
    I believe the hoop is there to prevent the gunner from shooting the prop. Will double check.
    As I understand it as well. Here's to low-tech solutions to life's not-so-little problems.

  9. #9

    Default

    Certainly has come up Chris - when I painted my s/ways one Max Headroom very kindly provided me with a card that had the Roland type arcs of fire - I also got a Roland base from AA store. I believe this was brought to Andreas attention when the release was first discussed but obviously Ares didn't go for it. Shame really, but I will play it as the Roland.
    Rather than messing with the base It might be easier to just say 360 for targets above, anywhere but the front arc for targets same level, normal rear arc for targets below. That's my plan if I get any more.

  10. #10

    Default

    I agree. That certainly seems the easiest way to play moving forward... especially considering I acquired a number of CL.IIs and Brisfits. I will probably swap in a Roland base, however, if I'm not playing with altitude.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flash View Post
    Certainly has come up Chris - when I painted my s/ways one Max Headroom very kindly provided me with a card that had the Roland type arcs of fire - I also got a Roland base from AA store. I believe this was brought to Andreas attention when the release was first discussed but obviously Ares didn't go for it. Shame really, but I will play it as the Roland.
    Rather than messing with the base It might be easier to just say 360 for targets above, anywhere but the front arc for targets same level, normal rear arc for targets below. That's my plan if I get any more.
    Well stated and I playing that way also.

  12. #12

    Default

    Andrea would have to chime in on this, but I think these planes were not given the Roland or 360 arcs for game balance purposes.

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberst Hajj View Post
    Andrea would have to chime in on this, but I think these planes were not given the Roland or 360 arcs for game balance purposes.
    It makes sense... Brisfits and CL.IIs were widely considered to be some of the best kites of the war.

    It makes me wonder, however, if any others were similarly limited or "buffed" in an attempt to achieve game balance. I've heard the arguments about possibly giving the Dr.1 a sharp left (90)... and I think the Bebe as well. Any others out there?

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberst Hajj View Post
    Andrea would have to chime in on this, but I think these planes were not given the Roland or 360 arcs for game balance purposes.
    That is why sometimes I play with points. Like the Roland increase of points they would also be increased because of the wide arc of fire. To me points lead to balance. I do realize alot of people do not like playing with points.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by john snelling View Post
    points lead to balance.
    And balance leads to the Dark side, be mindful of what you seek. em.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberst Hajj View Post
    And balance leads to the Dark side, be mindful of what you seek. em.
    According to some I'm already there. LOL

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberst Hajj View Post
    And balance leads to the Dark side, be mindful of what you seek. em.
    Cookies?!? Did someone say something about cookies!? I like cookies...

  18. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberst Hajj View Post
    Andrea would have to chime in on this, but I think these planes were not given the Roland or 360 arcs for game balance purposes.
    Game balance is for the weak and uncertain.
    Karl
    It is impossible for a man to begin to learn what he thinks he knows. -- Epictetus

  19. #19

    Default

    Our group played around with this a little bit last night. We don't normally worry TOO much about balance, but supposing we did, anyone got a guess on what the "points value" of the CL.II and Brisfit might be with the 360 firing arcs?

    As an aside, this was our group's first time flying the Bristols, and even without the 360 arc they were absolute monsters. What a scary plane...



Similar Missions

  1. Caudron G4 Firing Arcs
    By flashard in forum WGF: General Discussions
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-29-2016, 20:42
  2. Catalina firing Arcs ?
    By gully_raker in forum WGS: General Discussions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-20-2013, 19:21
  3. The Scarff ring and two seater firing arcs.
    By phililphall in forum Officer's Club
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-15-2013, 12:27
  4. New WW II Bombers firing arcs
    By Marechallannes in forum WGS: General Discussions
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-28-2012, 13:19
  5. Firing arcs for observers
    By Zoe Brain in forum WGF: General Discussions
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-04-2011, 03:08

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •