Ares Games
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Energy Rules for WGS - First Draft

  1. #1

    Default Energy Rules for WGS - First Draft

    These need play testing, unlike the simplified height rules.

    Rationale - the best tactical speeds for aircraft were all about 250 mph, even if they were capable of 400. The maneuver decks are based on 1cm of movement = 37 km/h (23mph). So a Spitfire can only go 300 mph in the game, not 360.

    However, by flying straight, speed can be gained to move faster than the cards allow -in a straight line. As soon as you do anything other than a fast straight or dive, you lose this "energy", you slow down to tactical speeds.

    Rules
    Aircraft that use fighter bases that do consecutive fast straights gain energy up to their maximum level flight energy level, for each one after the first. Place an energy counter on top of each fast straight.
    Each energy level extends the next fast straight move distance by one counter (any square counter will do).
    Fighters (ie anything that doesn't use a bomber base) can have up to 3 energy counters in level flight. Bombers have zero.
    Aircraft that do a dive automatically have their energy counters increased by 2 per peg lost up to a limit of 4. Vertical dives do not gain energy (the dive brakes prevent that).
    If there are Energy counters in excess of the maximum level flight limit (3 for fighters, 0 for bombers) one is discarded after use.
    If the aircraft does anything other than a fast straight or dive, all energy counters are immediately lost.
    Energy counters may be discarded at any time.

    Example - a Hurricane is having difficulty catching an He-111.
    It pulls away to the side, then increases its speed by energy, until it catches up, then turns in for the attack (losing all its energy in the turn).
    A good pilot will instead trade his energy for an additional peg of altitude in a climb, then turn, then dive to make a fast, slashing attack (gaining energy)

    So... attack from the port quarter... about 45 secs to a minute in reality.

    Climb 1 peg while flying parallel to the Heinkel.
    Fast straight.
    Fast straight, gain an energy counter.
    Fast straight, use the energy counter for movement (don't discard it) - now starting to catch up
    Fast straight, use the two energy counters for movement (don't discard them) - now gaining slowly
    Fast straight, use all three energy counters for movement (don't discard them) - now gaining quickly
    Repeat until to port of the Heinkel, out of range.
    Climb 1 peg, trade in all energy counters for another peg, so slightly behind the Heinkel and to its side.
    Turn Starboard towards the Heinkel
    Fast Straight, closing range from Heinkel's port rear.
    Turn port to slot in immediately behind the He-111, but 3 pegs higher (Heinkel dorsal gun only can fire, and at half range)
    Dive 2 levels, gaining 4 energy counters.
    Fast straight, using all 4 energy counters, discarding one. and open up from one level higher for an additional A shot, closing rapidly. If too rapid, just discard energy counters.


    Future, fast aircraft may gain 4 energy, not 3. Even mustangs and late model P-38s still dogfought at 300mph, they just went a lot faster doing boom'n'zoom.

    Bombers can only gain energy by diving, and start losing energy as soon as they level out. So the Heinkel might dive, and continue a shallow dive, to get away, until it runs out of altitude. These can be remarkably difficult to catch, and in the Battle of Britain, many Luftwaffe bombers escaped this way.

    This simulates as best I can using existing game mechanics some of the things seen in gun cameras.

    Aircraft gaining energy this way require full emergency boost and close attention to engine revs to get maximum acceleration.


    Example of a Spitfire gaining energy from consecutive fast straights:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	energy.jpg 
Views:	69 
Size:	27.9 KB 
ID:	84129
    Last edited by Zoe Brain; 04-03-2013 at 07:40.

  2. #2

    Default

    Hi Zoe,

    This is a fascinating idea, we need to do some play testing!

    Cheers,

    Carl.

  3. #3

    Default

    Great idea Zoe! I was working on this problem and here it was solved.

  4. #4

    Default

    So... we're eight months removed from the original post. Any play-testing to date, Zoe?

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fast.git View Post
    So... we're eight months removed from the original post. Any play-testing to date, Zoe?
    Hint, hint, Mr. Christopher.



Similar Missions

  1. Card rules vs mini rules
    By petitbilbo in forum Polls
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-06-2014, 03:52
  2. new altitude rules in Rules and Accessories Pack?
    By Gallo Rojo in forum WGF: General Discussions
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-09-2012, 15:12
  3. Altitude/Energy Variant: demo video
    By sightreader in forum WGF: House Rules
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-27-2011, 14:12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •