Ares Games
Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: Albatros C.III, Roland C.II and Rumpler C.IV at the front numbers

  1. #1

    Default Albatros C.III, Roland C.II and Rumpler C.IV at the front numbers

    I like the choice of the Albatros C.III that WOG decided upon. Now we have German 2 seater from 31 Dec 1915 to the eow.

    31 Dec 1915
    AEG C.I 26
    AGO C.I 14
    AGO C.I 2
    Albatros C.I 278
    Albatros C.III 12
    Aviatik C.I 81
    Aviatik C.II 0
    DFW C.I 25
    LVG C.I 45
    LVG C.II 138
    LVG C.IV 1
    Otto C.I 9
    Rumpler C.I 29
    Total 660

    28 Feb 1916
    AEG C.I 34
    AGO C.I 22
    AGO C.II 1
    AGO C.III 1
    Albatros C.I 349
    Albatros C.III 51
    Aviatik C.I 161
    Aviatik C.II 7
    DFW C.I 0
    LVG C.I 25
    LVG C.II 214
    LVG C.IV 1
    Otto C.I 1
    Rumpler C.I 67
    Total 934

    30 Apr 1916
    AEG C.I 34
    AEG C.II 1
    AGO C.I 15
    Albatros C.I 213
    Albatros C.III 208
    Aviatik C.I 150
    Aviatik C.II 6
    DFW C.I 0
    LVG C.I 11
    LVG C.II 249
    LVG C.IV 1
    Otto C.I 1
    Roland C.II 17
    Rumpler C.I 120
    Total 1029

    30 Jun 1916
    AEG C.I 0
    AGO C.I 23
    Albatros C.I 165
    Albatros C.III 300
    Aviatik C.I 219
    Aviatik C.II 0
    DFW C.I 2
    LVG C.I 4
    LVG C.II 255
    LVG C.IV 1
    Roland C.II 35
    Rumpler C.I 144
    Rumpler C.Ia 1
    Total 1184


    31 Aug 1916
    AEG C.I 1
    AGO C.I 16
    Albatros C.I 143
    Albatros C.III 354
    Albatros C.V 65
    Albatros C.VI 8
    Aviatik C.I 183
    Aviatik C.II 0
    Aviatik C.III 26
    DFW C.I 2
    LVG C.I 5
    LVG C.II 220
    LVG C.IV 27
    Roland C.II 37
    Roland C.IIa 13

    Rumpler C.I 202
    Total 1302

    31 Oct 1916
    AEG C.I 1
    AEG C.IV 9
    AGO C.I 9
    Albatros C.I 125
    Albatros C.III 320
    Albatros C.V 57
    Albatros C.VI 71
    Albatros C.VII 94
    Aviatik C.I 177
    Aviatik C.II 0
    Aviatik C.III 47
    DFW C.I 9
    DFW C.V 21
    LVG C.I 1
    LVG C.II 195
    LVG C.IV 60
    Roland C.II 45
    Roland C.IIa 11

    Rumpler C.I 231
    Rumpler C.Ia 2
    Total 1487

    31 Dec 1916
    AEG C.I 1
    AEG C.IV 42
    AGO C.I 8
    AGO C.IV 8
    Albatros C.I 90
    Albatros C.III 320
    Albatros C.V 47
    Albatros C.VI 53
    Albatros C.VII 249
    Aviatik C.I 110
    Aviatik C.II 22
    Aviatik C.III 22
    DFW C.I 6
    DFW C.V 42
    LVG C.I 1
    LVG C.II 155
    LVG C.IV 76
    Roland C.II 40
    Roland C.IIa 24

    Rumpler C.I 190
    Rumpler C.Ia 1
    Rumpler C.III 1
    Total 1508

    28 Feb 1917
    AEG C.I 1
    AEG C.IV 90
    AGO C.I 5
    AGO C.IV 25
    Albatros C.I 52
    Albatros C.III 214
    Albatros C.IV 1
    Albatros C.V 50
    Albatros C.VI 111
    Albatros C.VII 372
    Albatros C.Lf 3
    Aviatik C.I 63
    Aviatik C.II 62
    Aviatik C.III 20
    DFW C.I 5
    DFW C.V 79
    LVG C.I 0
    LVG C.II 87
    LVG C.IV 58
    Roland C.I 21
    Roland C.II 53
    Roland C.III 1
    Rumpler C.I 145
    Rumpler C.Ia 1
    Rumpler C.III 42
    Total 1561


    30 Apr 1917
    AEG C.I 1
    AEG C.IV 124
    AGO C.I 1
    AGO C.IV 1
    Albatros C.I 37
    Albatros C.III 174
    Albatros C.IV 2
    Albatros C.V 60
    Albatros C.VI 21
    Albatros C.VII 296
    Albatros C.VIII 1
    Albatros C.X 70
    Albatros C.Lf 1
    Aviatik C.I 27
    Aviatik C.II 50
    Aviatik C.III 6
    DFW C.I 3
    DFW C.V 341
    LVG C.I 1
    LVG C.II 45
    LVG C.IV 39
    Roland C.I 9
    Roland C.II 42
    Roland C.III 0
    Rumpler C.I 107
    Rumpler C.Ia 52
    Rumpler C.III 22
    Rumpler C.IV 24
    Total 1557

    30 Jun 1917
    AEG C.IV 127
    AGO C.IV 19
    Albatros C.I 46
    Albatros C.III 107
    Albatros C.IV 0
    Albatros C.V 57
    Albatros C.VI 3
    Albatros C.VII 165
    Albatros C.VIII 1
    Albatros C.X 98
    Albatros C.XII 41
    Aviatik C.I 12
    Aviatik C.II 34
    Aviatik C.III 2
    Aviatik C.V 1
    DFW C.I 1
    DFW C.V 839
    Hannover C.I 2
    LVG C.II 20
    LVG C.IV 14
    Roland C.I 1
    Roland C.II 1
    Roland C.II 12

    Rumpler C.I 55
    Rumpler C.Ia 162
    Rumpler C.III 15
    Rumpler C.IV 122
    Total 1966

    31 Aug 1917
    AEG C.IV 63
    AGO C.IV 90
    Albatros C.I 13
    Albatros C.III 29
    Albatros C.IV 2
    Albatros C.V 29
    Albatros C.VI 1
    Albatros C.VII 74
    Albatros C.VIII 1
    Albatros C.IX 2
    Albatros C.X 47
    Albatros C.XII 93
    Aviatik C.I 1
    Aviatik C.II 4
    Aviatik C.V 1
    DFW C.I 1
    DFW C.V 1057
    Hannover C.I 2
    LVG C.II 8
    LVG C.IV 1
    LVG C.V 98
    Roland C.II 1
    Roland C.IIa 1

    Rumpler C.I 37
    Rumpler C.Ia 129
    Rumpler C.III 7
    Rumpler C.IV 257
    Total 2046


    31 Oct 1917
    AEG C.IV 88
    AGO C.IV 42
    Albatros C.I 4
    Albatros C.III 15
    Albatros C.V 8
    Albatros C.VII 33
    Albatros C.VIII 1
    Albatros C.IX 2
    Albatros C.X 26
    Albatros C.XII 92
    Aviatik C.I 1
    Aviatik C.II 1
    Aviatik C.V 1
    DFW C.V 910
    LVG C.II 2
    LVG C.V 219
    Pfalz C.I 3
    Rumpler C.I 40
    Rumpler C.Ia 30
    Rumpler C.III 1
    Rumpler C.IV 225
    Rumpler C.V 3
    Total 1737

    31 Dec 1917
    AEG C.IV 68
    AGO C.IV 13
    Albatros C.I 2
    Albatros C.III 5
    Albatros C.V 5
    Albatros C.VII 11
    Albatros C.IX 1
    Albatros C.X 11
    Albatros C.XII 66
    DFW C.V 845
    LVG C.II 3
    LVG C.V 446
    Pfalz C.I 24
    Rumpler C.I 16
    Rumpler C.Ia 5
    Rumpler C.III 1
    Rumpler C.IV 208
    Rumpler C.V 9
    Rumpler C.VII 17
    Rumpler C.IX 20
    Total 1797


    28 Feb 1918
    AEG C.IV 40
    AGO C.IV 3
    Albatros C.I 0
    Albatros C.III 5
    Albatros C.V 5
    Albatros C.VII 6
    Albatros C.IX 1
    Albatros C.X 4
    Albatros C.XII 48
    DFW C.I 1
    DFW C.V 614
    LVG C.V 504
    Pfalz C.I 11
    Rumpler C.I 11
    Rumpler C.Ia 3
    Rumpler C.III 1
    Rumpler C.IV 161
    Rumpler C.VII 48
    Rumpler C.IX 13
    Total 1475


    30 Apr 1918
    AEG C.IV 26
    Albatros C.I 1
    Albatros C.III 1
    Albatros C.VII 4
    Albatros C.IX 1
    Albatros C.XII 36
    DFW C.V 665
    LVG C.V 565
    Pfalz C.I 7
    Rumpler C.I 9
    Rumpler C.Ia 3
    Rumpler C.III 1
    Rumpler C.IV 187
    Rumpler C.VII 94
    Rumpler C.IX 11
    Total 1611


    30 Jun 1918
    AEG C.IV 29
    Albatros C.III 2
    Albatros C.XII 20
    DFW C.V 623
    Halber C.V 10
    LVG C.V 312
    LVG C.VI 173
    Pfalz C.I 9
    Rumpler C.I 5
    Rumpler C.Ia 2
    Rumpler C.III 1
    Rumpler C.IV 182
    Rumpler C.V 4
    Rumpler C.VII 112
    Rumpler C.IX 5
    Total 1488

    31 Aug 1918
    AEG C.IV 34
    Albatros C.III 1
    Albatros C.VII 1
    Albatros C.XII 15
    DFW C.V 620
    Halber C.V 192
    LVG C.V 133
    LVG C.VI 400
    Pfalz C.I 6
    Rumpler C.I 4
    Rumpler C.Ia 1
    Rumpler C.IV 110
    Rumpler C.V 6
    Rumpler C.VII 85
    Rumpler C.IX 2
    Total 1610

  2. #2

    Default

    I agree John the Albatros C.III was a good choice. We just need an early war Allied two seater now to complement - BE2, FE, Nieuport 10, Voisin, Caudron, Farman - the list is expansive, just one to start would be great.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carl_Brisgamer View Post
    I agree John the Albatros C.III was a good choice. We just need an early war Allied two seater now to complement - BE2, FE, Nieuport 10, Voisin, Caudron, Farman - the list is expansive, just one to start would be great.
    Isn't that what we're getting with the Strutter?
    Karl
    It is impossible for a man to begin to learn what he thinks he knows. -- Epictetus

  4. #4

    Default

    The Sopwith was in service with one RNAS flight only by the end of April 1916, and it did not enter wider service with the RFC and French Aviation Militaire until July-August 1916. I see the Strutter as akin to the Roland - it was so good it was also used as an escort fighter when first introduced.

    I think a 1915 two seater to complement the Albatros you could fly with the Morane and against the Fokker Eindekker would be welcome.

  5. #5

    Thumbs up

    Its the BE 2 that we really, really need.
    The first British aircraft to reach France & the mainstay of recon & artillery spotting through Bloody April & beyond until the advent of the RE 8.
    The BE is a MUST HAVE!

  6. #6

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gully_raker View Post
    Its the BE 2 that we really, really need.
    The first British aircraft to reach France & the mainstay of recon & artillery spotting through Bloody April & beyond until the advent of the RE 8.
    The BE is a MUST HAVE!
    HERE HERE!!

    The BE2 was used by some units until the very end of the war.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by john snelling View Post
    What about the FE.2?
    The FE2 was also used throughout the war, continuing on as a night bomber after its daylight career ended.

    I think the BE2 is a better choice for the RFC as it was doing the observation business in 1914 and was still getting it done in 1918.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carl_Brisgamer View Post
    HERE HERE!!

    The BE2 was used by some units until the very end of the war.
    Target, target, target...

    Karl
    It is impossible for a man to begin to learn what he thinks he knows. -- Epictetus

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jager View Post
    Target, target, target...

    Karl


    It would also give a new fire arc base for aircraft with the observer in the front cockpit, which could be adapted to a number of early war aircraft.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carl_Brisgamer View Post


    It would also give a new fire arc base for aircraft with the observer in the front cockpit, which could be adapted to a number of early war aircraft.
    Good point! I'm about to commission my first BE2, and have no idea about the fire arc from the front-seat observer (except for the oblique arc to port, angled to miss the prop; I have a couple of Keith's 'A.A.' bases)
    Last edited by Flying Helmut; 07-15-2016 at 03:51.
    I laugh in the face of danger - then I hide until it goes away!

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying Helmut View Post
    Good point! I'm about to commission my first BE2, and have no idea about the fire arc from the front-seal observer (except for the oblique arc to port, angled to miss the prop; I have a couple of Keith's 'A.A.' bases)
    Have a look at these threads Tim, the BE can have a rear arc too, I can't find it at present but there is a cracking photo from the observers position looking over his gun to the rear of a BE2c.
    http://www.wingsofwar.org/forums/sho...2304-BE2c-card
    http://www.wingsofwar.org/forums/sho...18499-RAF-BE2c


    There we go

    Sapiens qui vigilat... "He is wise who watches"

  13. #13

    Default

    Thanks Dave!

    Very helpful.
    I laugh in the face of danger - then I hide until it goes away!

  14. #14

    Default

    The observer can shoot at targets to the rear if they are higher (more altitude pegs) and there are narrow arcs to the left and right rear at the same altitude. On some BE2s the gun could also be moved to fire forward in narrow arcs to the front left and right of the prop but only at the same altitude. I have a diagram somewhere I will upload in the morning.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carl_Brisgamer View Post
    The observer can shoot at targets to the rear if they are higher (more altitude pegs) and there are narrow arcs to the left and right rear at the same altitude. On some BE2s the gun could also be moved to fire forward in narrow arcs to the front left and right of the prop but only at the same altitude. I have a diagram somewhere I will upload in the morning.
    It's clear from the photos that with the gun in this position the gunner could engage targets at the same level Carl, with a fairly decent arc of fire.
    I use a standard rear arc with the usual blind spot applied. Some earlier ones had a four point mount so the gunner could move the gun about firing past the prop to the front and out the back to one side or the other. Think Max worked up a card for it many moons ago but the rear arcs could be bigger.

    Sapiens qui vigilat... "He is wise who watches"

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flash View Post
    It's clear from the photos that with the gun in this position the gunner could engage targets at the same level Carl, with a fairly decent arc of fire.
    I use a standard rear arc with the usual blind spot applied. Some earlier ones had a four point mount so the gunner could move the gun about firing past the prop to the front and out the back to one side or the other. Think Max worked up a card for it many moons ago but the rear arcs could be bigger.
    I have to disagree Dave. You can see the enemy but you cannot fire an MG with the muzzle that close to the pilot. I have had a couple of nasty personal experiences with automatic weapons discharged close to my head (blank and ball) and I can tell you the pilot could not do their job with the Lewis blasting away with a foot or two of his face.

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carl_Brisgamer View Post
    I have to disagree Dave. You can see the enemy but you cannot fire an MG with the muzzle that close to the pilot. I have had a couple of nasty personal experiences with automatic weapons discharged close to my head (blank and ball) and I can tell you the pilot could not do their job with the Lewis blasting away with a foot or two of his face.
    Excellent point. Do you think with regularity one could ever get use to it?

  18. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carl_Brisgamer View Post
    I have to disagree Dave. You can see the enemy but you cannot fire an MG with the muzzle that close to the pilot. I have had a couple of nasty personal experiences with automatic weapons discharged close to my head (blank and ball) and I can tell you the pilot could not do their job with the Lewis blasting away with a foot or two of his face.
    Feel free to disagree Carl but firing the gun from that position the muzzle will be a couple of feet from the driver's head whichever way you point it so I say you're wrong.
    And I know what you're saying having had similar experiences myself. Perhaps they were made of sterner stuff in those days....
    "No, no, sergeant, don't fire at the nasty German trying to kill us you'll give me a headache !"

    Seems the pilots of the FE2d weren't so fussy where the gunner was concerned !!

    Sapiens qui vigilat... "He is wise who watches"

  19. #19

    Default

    There's a difference shooting off to the side even by a few inches with the muzzle blast directed away from the pilot. If the front seat observer's fun position made no difference it does beg the question why did all air servces bother to redesign their aircraft and the observer in the rear cockpit i.e. BE2 - RE.8, Nieuport 10 - Nieuport 10AR, Albatros B series - Albatros C series?

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flash View Post
    Feel free to disagree Carl but firing the gun from that position the muzzle will be a couple of feet from the driver's head whichever way you point it so I say you're wrong.
    And I know what you're saying having had similar experiences myself. Perhaps they were made of sterner stuff in those days....
    "No, no, sergeant, don't fire at the nasty German trying to kill us you'll give me a headache !"

    Seems the pilots of the FE2d weren't so fussy where the gunner was concerned !!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	82 
Size:	237.4 KB 
ID:	202306

    Not quite the same circumstances considering the position of the Lewis on the FE

  21. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carl_Brisgamer View Post
    T... If the front seat observer's fun position made no difference it does beg the question why did all air servces bother to redesign their aircraft and the observer in the rear cockpit i.e. BE2 - RE.8, Nieuport 10 - Nieuport 10AR, Albatros B series - Albatros C series?
    Maybe it was so the observer could use the camera rather than the pilot and observe without the wings being in the way... as well as opening up arcs of fire even further.

    http://thevintageaviator.co.nz/proje...ory-be2-series

    Quote Originally Posted by Carl_Brisgamer View Post
    ...Not quite the same circumstances considering the position of the Lewis on the FE
    It is when you look at the position of the pilots Lewis gun if the gunner is seated.. and they did fire them past the gunners ears !

    Sapiens qui vigilat... "He is wise who watches"

  22. #22

    Default

    Greetings

    From what I can ascertain as 1917 progressed there were fewer and fewer Albatros C III on the Western Front. However, there is apparently a film at the IWM on Cambrai including men looking at a crashed CIII in November - though this might not be a new crash.

    So ideally one would want something like a Rumpler C.IV (?) for 1917-18 artillery observation work?

    Regards

    Edward

  23. #23

    Default

    Having the pilot at the front of the aircraft also improved his visibility for landing and take-off.

  24. #24

    'Warspite''s Avatar
    Users Country Flag


    Blog Entries
    4
    Name
    Barry
    Location
    north west Norfolk
    Sorties Flown
    760
    Join Date
    Apr 2013

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gully_raker View Post
    Its the BE 2 that we really, really need.
    The first British aircraft to reach France & the mainstay of recon & artillery spotting through Bloody April & beyond until the advent of the RE 8.
    The BE is a MUST HAVE!

    I would agree wholeheartedly. In addition to the BE2, it was also the basis for other machines.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_...Factory_B.E.12



Similar Missions

  1. WGF Western Front 1916-17 - 1/144 Skytrex Albatros D.II, Jasta 2
    By Carl_Brisgamer in forum Metal and Resin Models
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-03-2013, 07:03
  2. WOW Cards By The Numbers?
    By Diamondback in forum WGF: General Discussions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-29-2012, 14:32
  3. All Is Not Quiet Above The Western Front, Roland!
    By Archidamus in forum WGF: After Action Reports
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-20-2012, 02:04
  4. Serial Numbers
    By Boney10 in forum Hobby Room
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-02-2012, 04:45
  5. production numbers
    By rockyr in forum WGF: Historical Discussions
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-01-2011, 12:33

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •