Ares Games
Results 1 to 38 of 38

Thread: Wish list - squadron packs

  1. #1

    Default Wish list - squadron packs

    While I like the diversity of the Ares offerings, there are times when I wish that they would release something like a squadron pack. Just a set of the same aircraft with consistent squadron markings.

    Anyone else agree?

    Barry

  2. #2

    Default

    I could imagine that for an RFC squadron of Sopwith Camels or RAF SE5a's. Maybe for an Italian squadriglia but not for a German Jasta.

    Ares Games goes this way for the upcoming WW II Messerschmitts, Spitfires, Hurricanes & Stukas. - One miniature and a set of decals.
    Voilą le soleil d'Austerlitz!

  3. #3

    Default

    I love the idea - that's why I paint up my own!
    I laugh in the face of danger - then I hide until it goes away!

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying Helmut View Post
    I love the idea - that's why I paint up my own!
    I'm with you!

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying Helmut View Post
    I love the idea - that's why I paint up my own!
    Quote Originally Posted by john snelling View Post
    I'm with you!
    I'm just getting on this bus.

  6. #6

    Dom S's Avatar
    Users Country Flag


    Name
    Dom
    Location
    People's Republic of South Yorkshire
    Sorties Flown
    2,081
    Join Date
    Jun 2010

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marechallannes View Post
    I could imagine that for an RFC squadron of Sopwith Camels or RAF SE5a's. Maybe for an Italian squadriglia but not for a German Jasta.
    The degree of individuality on German aircraft makes it trickier, but for several types it's doable with a bit of careful research.

    Albatros D.V - I'm not sure offhand, as I'd need to research wing camouflage patterns, but I suspect you can at least get 3 or 4 aircraft that are identical apart from the pilot's personal marking from one of Jasta 12 or 15, possibly Jasta 5 too.

    Fokker Dr.I - I think Jasta 12 again, Jasta 19 for sure, probably others too.

    Fokker D.VII - Jasta 15 probably, 18 probably, 40 an absolute gift - 10 known machines, at least 8 of which were identical other than one marking on each side of the fuselage.
    Last edited by Dom S; 07-07-2016 at 09:53.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dom S View Post
    The degree of individuality on German aircraft makes it trickier, but for several types it's doable with a bit of careful research.

    Albatros D.V - I'm not sure offhand, as I'd need to research wing camouflage patterns, but I suspect you can at least get 3 or 4 aircraft that are identical apart from the pilot's personal marking from one of Jasta 12 or 15, possibly Jasta 5 too.

    Fokker Dr.I - I think Jasta 12 again, Jasta 19 for sure, probably others too.

    Fokker D.VII - Jasta 15 probably, 18 probably, 40 an absolute gift - 10 known machines, at least 8 of which were identical other than one marking on each side of the fuselage.
    Thanks Don for saving my time. I was going to research and come up with a list like yours. Just to some.

    Albatros D.III: Jasta 2, Jasta 50
    Jasta 5 Fokker D.VIIIs
    Jasta 6 Fokker D.VIIs

  8. #8

    Default

    The painted plane idea was a unique and nice concept when it first came out. Problem is they got sidetracked with the company changeover and still have not recovered. Many airframes have been un avalible for years except through e-bay or third parties. The way the new rules are printed without plane cards makes the old production rules sets even more valuable for the maneuver decks and plane cards. With those you can at least proxy or replace the aircraft as with the new rules set, no planes ....no playing.... period.

    Until such time as planes are made avalible again or at least the maneuver decks things will stay low key. The squadron boxes are an excellent way to get airframes and maneuver decks out there quickly. It should also be cheaper as most will not have the real fancy sticker jobs on them. The no maneuver deck attitude the company now has sort of stumps me, yes it means you have to buy their product to play, this I understand. But you need product avalible all the time for that concept to work. Some of the most important airframes have been out of production since the old company died. That is way too long for planes like the DH 2, Alb D3, or the SE5a to not be avalible. New unique planes are nice, but you have to have the basics covered or it is a waste of time and resources. We are also missing basic airframes STILL like the RAF FE2, RAF BE2, Sopwith Pup, Sopwith Dolphin, Nieuport 12, and many German ones also.

    I love the game and timeframe, planes are nice also ( but the decreasing quality is worrisome), but see it as a fringe group not due to the rules but due to avalibility. If they tweak the rules boxes to include at least 2 planes and extra sets of maneuver decks that would be a good start. I just can not fanthom the concept that you have to buy planes that are mostly unavalible to play the game in the box as it is unplayable in it's current form. Selling the decks by themselves could also raise needed capital to ramp up production and get the molds needed to reproduce the older stuff.

  9. #9

    Default

    Using decal options would work well for squadron packs of Entente models with fixed paint schemes, be they cammo or plain. Two or three squadron decal options could really step things up.
    Less easy to get variety with German stuff as many paint schemes involved jasta markings of course.
    Last edited by flash; 07-09-2016 at 04:13.

    Sapiens qui vigilat... "He is wise who watches"

  10. #10

    Default

    I agree. I'd very much like to see more of the older series of planes than the newer, rather obscure, models being produced. I have YET to get my hands on a few DH 2's, which strikes me as particularly ludicrous since they're highlighted in almost all of the game play examples in the WOG rulebook! My friends and I have wanted to play 100 year "anniversary" campaigns of WWI's air war, but have been somewhat stifled due to the lack of requisite reprints.

  11. #11

    Default

    I am for all the above and my wallet is open.

  12. #12

    Default

    Ho ho! I am happy ARES is going to release Hurricane sq pack with 303 markings. C'mon and take my money!
    <img src=http://www.wingsofwar.org/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=2554&dateline=1409073309 border=0 alt= />
    "We do not stop playing when we get old, but we get old when we stop playing."

  13. #13

    Default

    I really don't care what they release I just wish they would release more often.

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nightbomber View Post
    Ho ho! I am happy ARES is going to release Hurricane sq pack with 303 markings. C'mon and take my money!
    But this is the WW1 section, you 'Happy Jammer', you!
    I laugh in the face of danger - then I hide until it goes away!

  15. #15

    Default

    If the WW2 Squadron packs are a success, that will be an incentive for Ares to extend the idea to WW1.

  16. #16

    Default

    Not to whine to much but something, anything more often would make me happier

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grumpybear View Post
    Not to whine to much but something, anything more often would make me happier
    I'm with you Darell. I can put up with minor blips, I'd rather be able to play more with more variety of planes myself.

  18. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Naharaht View Post
    If the WW2 Squadron packs are a success, that will be an incentive for Ares to extend the idea to WW1.
    Can you imagine how many miniatures Ares would sell with SE5a and Fokker D.VII squadron packs? I would suggest the numbers would astound.

  19. #19

    Default

    I may be unique, but rather than a box with identical planes and a sticker sheet to make them up the way that you want, Id rather have a set of 3 different planes each representing a different squadron with a sticker set for each which you could make 5 or so models from.

    That way those of us happy with just one representative plane from each squadron could buy one pack, while you guys that want 5 nearly identical planes from a single squadron could buy 5 packs and get complete 3 different squadrons at once.

    Then again, they could just release the one generic scheme as a single with a sticker sheet and you could just by 5 of them. Couldn't you? Seems just as good as a multi pack of them. Maybe do an unstickered single to test the waters.

  20. #20

    Dom S's Avatar
    Users Country Flag


    Name
    Dom
    Location
    People's Republic of South Yorkshire
    Sorties Flown
    2,081
    Join Date
    Jun 2010

    Default

    It's rather the point of releasing with a decal sheet that you only need a single plane, not any kind of multi-pack.

  21. #21

    Default

    I would prefer a matchup of a Alb D3 or D5 vs the SE5a. Both were active late 1917 and both are early sculpts very difficult to get. Fok D7's seem to be easier to get so are not as vital to reprint.

    EDIt:..OK looked, the D5 is not anywhere near as rare as the D3.

    Edit pt 2...DH2 vs the Alb C3 as a interesting fight?
    Last edited by Shadowcat; 07-12-2016 at 00:47. Reason: Add on

  22. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dom S View Post
    It's rather the point of releasing with a decal sheet that you only need a single plane, not any kind of multi-pack.
    Okay that's good to know. As long as they don't replace all the more unique planes in a series, I certainly don't mind if they do 1 out of the 3 with a sticker sheet.

  23. #23

    Default

    So, my original thought was more about sets of planes from the same squadron that could be used together in a historical fashion. Something like 4 fighters from Jasta 6. The customize yourself with decals is fine, but, would be hard for Central powers.

    Barry

  24. #24

    Default

    True enough!

    Most Jastas would be unsuitable for a "single plane, lots of decals" option.

    Trouble is, flying a kette of Jasta birds, or a flight of Entente kites, seems to appeal only to a small, niche market.
    Those who can repaint, like myself, already do so, reducing the interested group even further.

    Targeting a commercial release at only a small part of the market would be hazardous, to say the least.
    I wish Ares would do so, but I don't think they will - the risk is too great.
    I laugh in the face of danger - then I hide until it goes away!

  25. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying Helmut View Post
    True enough!

    Most Jastas would be unsuitable for a "single plane, lots of decals" option.

    Trouble is, flying a kette of Jasta birds, or a flight of Entente kites, seems to appeal only to a small, niche market.
    Those who can repaint, like myself, already do so, reducing the interested group even further.

    Targeting a commercial release at only a small part of the market would be hazardous, to say the least.
    I wish Ares would do so, but I don't think they will - the risk is too great.
    100% agree, I think some more variety in the Duel packs would be great, like D.VII vs Snipe, SE5a vs Albi D.III. Or even a Squadron pack like a 56 Squadron of 3 SE5as would be awesome.

  26. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Canestri10 View Post
    a Squadron pack like a 56 Squadron of 3 SE5as would be awesome.
    I'd be in that parade!
    I laugh in the face of danger - then I hide until it goes away!

  27. #27

    Default

    I quite like the idea of squadron packs for WW2, but for WW1 I have to admit I prefer the individual paint schemes for famous pilots like Richtofen, Udet, Guynemer, Fonck, etc. To me, having a wide variety of colors and patterns on the board adds to the fun of WW1 dogfights.

  28. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfbiter View Post
    I quite like the idea of squadron packs for WW2, but for WW1 I have to admit I prefer the individual paint schemes for famous pilots like Richtofen, Udet, Guynemer, Fonck, etc. To me, having a wide variety of colors and patterns on the board adds to the fun of WW1 dogfights.
    That's exactly what draws many first-time punters to the tables at conventions where we in the U.K Wing run participation games.

    The colourful little planes are a great attention-getter!

    Thank you, Ares!
    I laugh in the face of danger - then I hide until it goes away!

  29. #29

    Default

    I can't imagine a lot of situations where I would try flying 3 or more planes from a single squadron in a game. And if you are playing with other people on your side, you'd probably want to use more distinctive schemes.

    I'm more for a big variety of distinctive schemes than SE5 D1, D2, D3, etc.

  30. #30

    JeffM
    Guest


    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by greenalfonzo View Post
    I can't imagine a lot of situations where I would try flying 3 or more planes from a single squadron in a game. And if you are playing with other people on your side, you'd probably want to use more distinctive schemes.

    I'm more for a big variety of distinctive schemes than SE5 D1, D2, D3, etc.
    Same thoughts myself.
    A squad of identically painted miniatures with a bit of variation in decals doesn't really add to game play for me.
    For when I get in my obsessive compulsive historical re-creation mood, being able to muster a single squad of planes would be cool....but that will rarely (if ever) happen for me. Just don't play with that many planes at any one time.

    From a game play perspective, distinct paint schemes are much more useful/add to the game.

    (But yes, I plan on purchasing a WW2 BoB starter set and several "Squad Packs" when they come out, though I know they will just sit around or be used to make a scenario! That specific battle just calls for it!)

  31. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowcat View Post

    Edit pt 2...DH2 vs the Alb C3 as a interesting fight?
    It would be a GREAT fight ... if only one could get his/her hands on a DH2!

  32. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carl_Brisgamer View Post
    Can you imagine how many miniatures Ares would sell with SE5a and Fokker D.VII squadron packs? I would suggest the numbers would astound.
    I would buy them!

  33. #33

    Default

    What do you reckon about a Flik 41J Oeffag 153 series Albatros D.III squadron pack?

    Name:  Flik 41J.jpg
Views: 254
Size:  133.8 KB
    Last edited by Carl_Brisgamer; 08-23-2016 at 02:17.

  34. #34

    Default

    OT: Am I correct in thinking the D.III/153 has a D.V tail? So much for the 153 as a straight reprint... might need as much a full new sculpt as the 253.
    Historical Consultant/Researcher, Wings and Sails lines - Unless stated otherwise, all comments are personal opinion only and NOT official Ares policy.
    Wings Checklists: WWI (down Navarre Nieuport, Ares Drachens) | WWII (complete)

  35. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    OT: Am I correct in thinking the D.III/153 has a D.V tail? So much for the 153 as a straight reprint... might need as much a full new sculpt as the 253.
    Would love it, I already hand painted two of them having the other two would just be grand.

  36. #36

    tinfish's Avatar
    Users Country Flag


    Name
    Stephen
    Location
    Tyne and Wear
    Sorties Flown
    42
    Join Date
    Jul 2016

    Default

    I think they would solve a lot by simple adding Decal sheets and not worrying so much about making a plane individual out of the box.
    Many of us will of course want to represent a squadron, without having every aircraft have the same markings and serial codes.

  37. #37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tinfish View Post
    I think they would solve a lot by simple adding Decal sheets and not worrying so much about making a plane individual out of the box.
    Many of us will of course want to represent a squadron, without having every aircraft have the same markings and serial codes.
    As Ares is going that way with WW2 I hope it is a success and convinces them to try it with WW1.

  38. #38

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JeffM View Post
    A squad of identically painted miniatures with a bit of variation in decals doesn't really add to game play for me.
    Just don't play with that many planes at any one time.

    From a game play perspective, distinct paint schemes are much more useful/add to the game.
    Quote Originally Posted by greenalfonzo View Post
    I can't imagine a lot of situations where I would try flying 3 or more planes from a single squadron in a game. And if you are playing with other people on your side, you'd probably want to use more distinctive schemes.

    I'm more for a big variety of distinctive schemes than SE5 D1, D2, D3, etc.
    I totally agree with Jeff and Green Alfonzo.

    Moreover, Ares Games has once proposed a plane with the same painting and just a different personnal marking : the Siemens Schuckert DIII
    The model that had a different painting was a best seller and sold out : pilot Lange.
    The 2 other models with the same painting can still be purchased in web gaming store : pilots Veltjens and Von Beaulieu Marconnay.



Similar Missions

  1. National 2016 Show List for UK North of England Squadron
    By Lt. S.Kafloc in forum UK Wing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-01-2015, 04:05
  2. Peg packs: how many to get?
    By Diamondback in forum WGF: General Discussions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-30-2013, 14:26
  3. Booster packs
    By Pakratt in forum WGF: Rules Help
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-20-2012, 08:40
  4. SIXTY SQUADRON R.A.F. a History of the Squadron from its formation
    By usmc1855 in forum WGF: Historical Discussions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-16-2011, 00:32
  5. A web site dedicated to 100 Squadron RFC with THE ANNALS of 100 SQUADRON
    By Attila57 in forum WGF: Historical Discussions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-02-2011, 13:11

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •