As far as the site sponsor thing is concerned, I quite understand why the Col has chosen this route, but I must admit I considered vacating the site when it was announced, since, effectively, it means the site has gone from being a neutral resource to backing a single retailer (who is not even a practical option for many members, particularly those outside the USA. For example, if I want to buy just two miniatures, the price per item is good, but the postage is over $40!! Obvious boxed sets are not, if they are not being mailed inland. going to be mailed for free, either.)
This coupled with the ruling that we cannot list reliable retailers if they are not Sponsors, seems overkill, if the retailers are only relevant to . a flight outside the USA. I feel that we should be able to compile a list of (for example) UK traders that we can refer fellow flight members to, when they need help, with a list of useful and trusted links, as we used to. I am sure many members found this invaluable.
So I have a sponsor I am unlikely to ever use, and I can't just refer to threads to find links to dealers a lot more local to me. I think I have lost a particularly useful service, by the ruling.
This is aside from the side issue of now having a commercial income based on a trader's profit, which all seems less than satisfactory to me.
Am I the only one to feel like this, or do others agree? If I am a lone voice I will shut up.
John
Bookmarks