Ares Games
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Areodromes... how close to the front?

  1. #1

    Default Areodromes... how close to the front?

    Just how close were the aerodromes to the front lines? Were they within eyesight? IE, my next big project, being a No-mans land map... I was thinking of placing two aerodromes on the map, one for each side... but not sure if it was historically probable to have them so close to the front lines...

  2. #2

    Default

    Most of the Aerodromes were back of the lines outside of artillery range. That being said, Jasta 11 often landed a "field" just several miles behind the lines in order to have a faster response time. MvR talks about this in his book.

    I'm not sure what Ares' NML map is going to look like, but if I was making one, I'd make it a little lopsided. Meaning, I'd have NML and the trenches fairly close to one side. The large side would then have some strategic elements on it like a true aerodrome, supply depot, etc. The small side would be enough for missions that require one to get back to their side of the lines.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LingSter View Post
    ... Were they within eyesight? ...
    I wouldn't have thought they would be that close John - if you can see it then you can shell it and most arty pieces had ranges up to 5,6,7 miles, some had double that so I guess the fields would be several miles behind the lines for safety.

    Sapiens qui vigilat... "He is wise who watches"

  4. #4

    Default

    then I guess a no-mans land map should not have the aerodromes on it.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberst Hajj View Post
    I'm not sure what Ares' NML map is going to look like, but if I was making one, I'd make it a little lopsided. Meaning, I'd have NML and the trenches fairly close to one side. The large side would then have some strategic elements on it like a true aerodrome, supply depot, etc. The small side would be enough for missions that require one to get back to their side of the lines.
    I'd love to see (and buy) this one.

    A geomorphic NML usable with the three already existing would be a win-win.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberst Hajj View Post
    I'm not sure what Ares' NML map is going to look like, but if I was making one, I'd make it a little lopsided. Meaning, I'd have NML and the trenches fairly close to one side. The large side would then have some strategic elements on it like a true aerodrome, supply depot, etc. The small side would be enough for missions that require one to get back to their side of the lines.
    And if you get two like this and put the trench ends opposite each other we get an double map with a trench line in the middle, sounds good to me

  7. #7

    Default

    Can't speak for WWI, but I know in WWII 9th Air Force (the Tac Air boys) tried to keep their strips within 100 miles of the front line--I have engineering drawings for their standard airstrip designs, and I'm working on trying to replicate them as a Ground Target card.
    Historical Consultant/Researcher, Wings and Sails lines - Unless stated otherwise, all comments are personal opinion only and NOT official Ares policy.
    Wings Checklists: WWI (down Navarre Nieuport, Ares Drachens) | WWII (complete)

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    Can't speak for WWI, but I know in WWII 9th Air Force (the Tac Air boys) tried to keep their strips within 100 miles of the front line--I have engineering drawings for their standard airstrip designs, and I'm working on trying to replicate them as a Ground Target card.
    Then there was Korea, where at one point the tac-air crowd could bomb and strafe targets just by flying around the pattern....

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by csadn View Post
    Then there was Korea, where at one point the tac-air crowd could bomb and strafe targets just by flying around the pattern....
    Yeh, but the Pusan Pocket wasn't were I'd like to be based in the fall of '50

    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    Can't speak for WWI, but I know in WWII 9th Air Force (the Tac Air boys) tried to keep their strips within 100 miles of the front line--I have engineering drawings for their standard airstrip designs, and I'm working on trying to replicate them as a Ground Target card.
    Sign me up for one of those, if you get it done
    Karl
    It is impossible for a man to begin to learn what he thinks he knows. -- Epictetus

  10. #10

    Default

    In the High Altitude line, you'd probably only be getting a card; in the Medium Altitude series it might actually be a 3d airstrip complete with a few itty-bitty parked planes and 3d revetments. True 1/200 or even Low Level 1/300, at 5000' runway you'd need an entire table... possibly a room.

    In 1/1200, a full runway would be a skosh over 4', 1/700 a dash over 7, about 16'8" in 1/300, and perfect plane match in 1/200 25'. And that's for an airstrip big enough for just a single Fighter Group, 75 hardstands pluss a 200'x600' apron for transient aircraft. A strip built for a Bomb Group would be even bigger...
    Historical Consultant/Researcher, Wings and Sails lines - Unless stated otherwise, all comments are personal opinion only and NOT official Ares policy.
    Wings Checklists: WWI (down Navarre Nieuport, Ares Drachens) | WWII (complete)

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jager View Post
    Yeh, but the Pusan Pocket wasn't were I'd like to be based in the fall of '50
    Neither did anyone else -- but it wasn't as tho' they had a choice, did they?

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberst Hajj View Post
    I'd have NML and the trenches fairly close to one side. The large side would then have some strategic elements on it like a true aerodrome, supply depot, etc. The small side would be enough for missions that require one to get back to their side of the lines.
    Just like Cyril LEROY Verdun mats (3 parts) that are supposed to be produced by Ares Games, maybe next year for the 100th Verdun battle aniversary.
    The city of Verdun with Meuse river on south part, central part includes several forts (Douaumont, Souville, St Michel, Belleville), no man's land on north.

    On A point, airships depot and buildings
    On B point, an aerodrome

    Name:  TAPIS cyril 002.jpg
Views: 208
Size:  276.7 KBName:  TAPIS001 cyril Leroy.jpg
Views: 187
Size:  257.1 KB

    A) point : airships depot and buildings
    Name:  detail11.jpg
Views: 203
Size:  85.1 KB

    B) point : an aerodrome
    Name:  detail13.jpg
Views: 208
Size:  125.3 KB
    Last edited by monse; 04-16-2015 at 23:59.

  13. #13

    'Warspite''s Avatar
    Users Country Flag


    Blog Entries
    4
    Name
    Barry
    Location
    north west Norfolk
    Sorties Flown
    760
    Join Date
    Apr 2013

    Default

    Airfields on the edge of No Man's Land is probably unrealistic unless it is a former airfield which was over-run during an offensive. We lost several during the great German offensive of 1918.

    As for artillery range, as a commander you would want to keep your airfields out of field-artillery range at least. No Allied airfield was ever truly out of artillery range after the Germans deployed the Paris Gun.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Gun

    This had a range of about 75 miles but was only ever aimed at Paris itself.

  14. #14

    Default

    I just read in "Naval 8, A history os No. 8 Squadron R.N.A.S." that once they were 3 1/2 miles behind the front. A German attack did indeed shell them. The attack happened on a badly fogged in day and they could not fly the machiines away to safety. The CO ordered the men away and had the planes destroyed as troops from the front were falling back in disarray.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teaticket View Post
    I just read in "Naval 8, A history os No. 8 Squadron R.N.A.S." that once they were 3 1/2 miles behind the front. A German attack did indeed shell them. The attack happened on a badly fogged in day and they could not fly the machiines away to safety. The CO ordered the men away and had the planes destroyed as troops from the front were falling back in disarray.
    But if not a unique event, it should at least be very rare, as others have already pointed out.

  16. #16

    Default

    I read in one of my Ospreys about a German Jasta which was "rolled" by a creeping barrage of Allied artillery - can't recall which one though!

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 'Warspite' View Post
    Airfields on the edge of No Man's Land is probably unrealistic unless it is a former airfield which was over-run during an offensive. We lost several during the great German offensive of 1918.

    As for artillery range, as a commander you would want to keep your airfields out of field-artillery range at least. No Allied airfield was ever truly out of artillery range after the Germans deployed the Paris Gun.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Gun

    This had a range of about 75 miles but was only ever aimed at Paris itself.
    Given the accuracy of that gun, good luck even hitting an aerodrome.
    Karl
    It is impossible for a man to begin to learn what he thinks he knows. -- Epictetus



Similar Missions

  1. UK RFC AREODROMES
    By Lt. S.Kafloc in forum WGF: General Discussions
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-11-2015, 11:27
  2. V1 and V2 close up
    By andron234 in forum UK Wing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-10-2014, 11:52
  3. Close to Home
    By BobP in forum Officer's Club
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-26-2014, 11:15
  4. Close enough!!!! Close enough!!!!
    By phililphall in forum Officer's Club
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-17-2011, 04:22
  5. how close is close?
    By rockyr in forum WGF: Historical Discussions
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-30-2011, 07:22

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •